Friday June 24, 2005
What is Love?
This week we had a couple of out-of-town visitors staying with us, including The Wife's cousin Cera. One night we were all watching the TV show Hit Me Baby One More Time, on which has-been artists perform their one big hit and also cover a new song. One of the artists was Haddaway, who sang his unforgettable "What is Love?", and it got me thinking about the lyrics. I said, "What does this song even mean, anyway? He asks his baby 'What is love?' and then asks her not to hurt him any more? Is she beating him or something?"
Cera had a different interpretation.
She said (half kidding, I think), "No, no—he's saying 'what is love' doesn't hurt him any more." Ah, interesting! In that interpretation, the title phrase is a nominalized relative serving as the subject of the sentence. It's not possible to distinguish between these two readings because rock and disco lyrics are usually in a sort of pseudo-AAVE dialect that neutralizes imperative don't and declarative third-person singular doesn't—both have the form don't. Here are two standard English paraphrases that capture the difference:
(1) What is love? Baby, don't hurt me any more.
(2) That which is love, baby, doesn't hurt me any more.
Which of these, then, did Haddaway really intend? It's hard to tell. He was apparently born in Trinidad but raised in Cologne, Germany (which explains why we also had a lot of trouble placing his accent), so he's probably not a native speaker of AAVE, and that might argue for (1), since (2) requires the AAVE neutralization. However, Haddaway probably (like many white artists—think Mick Jagger) adopts AAVE for song lyrics because it's a convention of the genre, which puts us back to square one. The only thing that might give us a clue as to which interpretation he intended is the title of the song, which (at least on Amazon) includes a question mark, which suggests that (1) above is what he meant. But only he knows for sure...
[Now playing: what do you think?]
I am The Tensor, and I approve this post.
05:10 AM
in Linguistics
| Submit:
| Links:
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c88ad53ef00d8348034fb69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What is Love?:
Comments
I really dig the alternative interpretation, but I'm pretty sure he meant option 1, which is probably more appropriately elaborated as "What is love? Is love something in which people keep hurting one another, emotionally, over and over again? I don't think so. Love is not about hurt, baby. Don't hurt me no more. Love me." Or something. Yeah. (Isn't it "Baby, don't hurt me NO more"? - could also lend support to the AAVE theory, on the other hand.)
Posted by: polyglot conspiracy at Jun 24, 2005 7:43:53 AM
i wasnt kidding, i really always sang it with that interpretation in mind!
that which is love, baby, dont hurt me, dont hurt me, no mo!
neh says he always though that "what is love?" was a rhetorical question being asked by Haddaway's internal greek chorus as he pleaded with his lover to no longer betray him.
then again, neh is known for putting WAY too much into the internal life and story of disco songs. you HAVE to ask him his interpretation of "you can ring my bell"....
Posted by: cera at Jun 24, 2005 2:10:27 PM
also...dude. i'm your cousin too.
Posted by: cera at Jun 24, 2005 2:10:54 PM
Sounds like (1), to me.
I'm reminded of Dweezil Zappa's cover of "Hit Me Baby One More Time", which feels to me like a creepy paean to domestic violence. It even sounds violent. If you didn't know the slang (and hadn't seen Britney's salacious gyrations and lack of visible bruises), I think it'd be a fair assumption. :)
Even further off-topic -- have you heard Peter Sellers's covers of The Beatles? (Scroll down here for some of them.) Always fun, seeing how far you can twist words...
Posted by: Sam at Jul 2, 2005 6:33:05 AM